In an unsurprising move, Google decided on June 9 to remove its visual bookmarks manager from upcoming new Chrome releases after an avalanche of user complaints that the bookmark tiles took up too much screen space and that the manager used up too much computer resources. This one issue alone, even with an option provided by Google developers to turn it off, caused many users to switch to other browsers.
Yet, users have been leaving in droves since mid-April for another reason and Google’s decision last week will not stop this mass exodus.
Google changed its policy regarding plugins: In September, Google won’t permit user access to NPAPI plugins like Flash, Unity, Java and Silverlight. According to chiropractor Brian Torchin, Google claims that the switch is for security reasons and that every other browser company is doing the same. Yet, experts agree that other companies are waiting for website owners around the world to catch up with newer security measures and that Google is trying push its own products on users by removing access to products offered by its competition.
As of early this morning, Thursday, June 18, complaints about this issue continue to stream into the Google Product Forum. The thread about the topic has reached 21 pages. Most users state they love Chrome, but they need the plugins for work, banking and/or entertainment and that they’re switching browsers now or once v45 comes out in September.
One common thread of most car safety innovations is that they have kept the people in the car safe. Backup cameras can also keep a person in a parking lot from being backed over when a driver is backing out of their parking space, so that is an example of one safety technology that helps people outside the car as well. Google is now raising the bar on protecting pedestrians. They have been awarded a patent on a design they submitted for a series of airbags on the outside of their new driverless cars that would deploy in the event an imminent collision is detected. Their deployment would cushion the impact for pedestrians or another car in an accident as well as presumably mitigating exterior damage to the outside of the driverless car. This is a rare safety feature that will be win-win for both the people in and around the car.