Anyone can learn Math with Teach to One

Teach to One is a new approach to learning mathematics. A program that uses digital resources to connect the student with a personalized curriculum that represents the student’s learning aptitude. Teach to One challenges the learners to excel by embracing new ideas.

Personalized Learning

A student-centered learning approach is a personalized student learning plan based on what, when, how, and where a student learns. The tailored approach allows learners to experience different instructional content and settings based on their needs, skills, and interests. Typically, the Teach to One program replaces the school’s core Math curriculum and inserts the learner’s customized course strategy throughout all aspects of the learning process.

Teach to One: Math composition has an academic design that comprises instructional content, student learning progressions, assessments, and classroom supplies. The operational model supports student regrouping, the reorganization of the classroom, and embraces new uses of technology.

History

According to Crunchbase, personalized learning is not new. Educators recognized prior knowledge and experiences of learners vary, and adjustments to what, when, and how the students learn must occur. The history of customized learning dates back to the 1880s. Today, there is a peak in alternative learning strategies. History delineates the use of many personalized instructional plans.

Pros / Cons

The teachers have a real-time view of the students’ progress through the Teacher Portal. Educators can access their daily work and schedules, make lesson plan adjustments, and highlight subject content. The instructors can give formative feedback daily. Students and parents can access information in real time too. Assessment with an accurate diagnostic analysis is more effective. However, creating tools that provide educators with an exact representation of a student’s precise level of understanding is complex.

Impact

Fourteen Teach to One schools that operated the model for three years observed a 23% greater learning gains than students nationally on the NWEA Map test. Students experienced greater growth with a 53% above the national average in schools that applied the growth-aligned accountability measures.

https://www.issuelab.org/resources/16320/16320.pdf

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *